RoboCop.2014.Bluray.1080p.DTS-HD.x264-Grym
- Type:
- Video > HD - Movies
- Files:
- 4
- Size:
- 15.81 GiB (16980315162 Bytes)
- Info:
- IMDB
- Spoken language(s):
- English
- Tag(s):
- 1080p
- Uploaded:
- 2014-05-10 15:17:40 GMT
- By:
- vonRicht
- Seeders:
- 0
- Leechers:
- 1
- Comments
- 8
- Info Hash: AFDC6DE870C2676BA2B682F4EBADEF6CF33199B6
(Problems with magnets links are fixed by upgrading your torrent client!)
RoboCop.2014.Bluray.1080p.DTS-HD.x264-Grym.mkv In 2028 Detroit, when Alex Murphy - a loving husband, father and good cop - is critically injured in the line of duty, the multinational conglomerate OmniCorp sees their chance for a part-man, part-robot police officer. Director..........: José Padilha Writer............: Joshua Zetumer (Screenplay) Starring..........: Joel Kinnaman, Gary Oldman, Michael Keaton iMDB URL..........: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1234721 SOURCE TYPE.......: Retail Blu-Ray 30,7 GB Movie @ 26286 kbps / 40,0 GB Full ViDEO SPECS.......: x264 2PASS @ 14000+ Kbps ([email protected]) - 23.976 fps AUDiO SPECS.......: English DTS-HD Master 5.1 3954 kbps 48 kHz 24 bit 1509 kbps RUNTiME...........: 1h 57 min MOViE CROPPED.....: No FiLM ASPECT RATiO.: 2.35:1 Anamorphic Scope / Letterbox RESOLUTiON........: 1920 X 1080 EXTRAS............: Yes SUBTiTLES.........: English, Spanish (2), Italian, Portuguese, Chinese (2), Thai, Indonesian, Malay, Korean, Vietnamese SUBTiTLES EXTRAS..: Spanish (2), Italian, Portuguese, Chinese (2), Korean, Thai ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Q & A: 1) How do I Bitstream TrueHD & DTS-HD Master audio From my PC to My surround Receiver? Part 1 - Setting up Sound / Bitstreaming in Windows (Only read and Use first Part about Windows): http://www.mediasmartserver.net/2010/02/02/guide-setting-up-bitstreaming-with-your-windows-7-htpc-part-i/ Part 2 - Setting up Software & Software Player: http://www.mediasmartserver.net/2011/06/30/guide-setting-up-lav-filters-mpc-hc-for-all-your-splitter-and-audio-needs 2) So how can I watch your not cropped x264 rip in the so-called 2.35:1 Anamorphic/Letterbox image, mate? First, I'm not any special expert on this aspect ratio thing regarding technicalities about anamorphic lenses, on how a pro DP obtains the 2.35:1 aspect ratio or how a DP works with anamorphic or letterbox. If you want real expertise on the matter then use your powerfull friend Google. What really matters here is that the movie is shown in the correct aspect ratio on the telly! My english is second language so bear with me. Ok second, we have Film Aspect Ratio = Letterbox, CinemaScope, Panavision etc. = 2.35:1, 1.85:1, 1.78:1, 1.66:1 ect. Film Aspect Ratio is the ratio of the width of the visible area of the video/film frame to the height of the visible area. Then there's the "black bars". In reality, these "black bars" are actually unused areas of the image. These areas are black to allow for better contrast. The wrongly called "black bars" is in fact part of the image! So if any part of the black unused areas is cropped/cut of the image then the original Aspect/Scope/Letterbox ratio is lost! For ever! And then we have Encoding Aspect Ratio. For example full-resolution 2.35:1 anamorphic aspect ratio encoding is 2538x1080. Blu-Ray discs is 16:9 (1920x1080) aspect ratio encoded. But the original Film Aspect Ratio is still 2.35:1 anamorphic/letterbox scope or 1.85:1 widescreen or what ever film aspect ratio. All depending on what film aspect ratio/framing the Director has chosen to use. So you have to differentiate between the two. Third, Yes I know that a Blu-Ray player cannot playback anamorphic/letterbox material (Film Aspect Ratio and Encoding Aspect Ratio) but the anamorphic/ letterbox scope, as mentioned above, is still in the transfer/encode, so for this to work you have to rip the blu-Ray disc to PC, and play it back anamorphic /Letterbox from there (Film Aspect Ratio). Or just grab one of Grym's uncropped x264 rips and use that for anamorphic/Letterbox playback from PC. Let's move on with the how's and do's of showing a correct 2.35:1 anamorphic/Letterbox aspect ratio shot image on your 16:9 tv screen. You can watch the movie in original 2.35:1 Anamorphic/Letterbox Scope, like you do in the theater, by setting the aspect ratio in your software player to 2.35:1. Aka Panavision, Cinemascope, Metrovision ect (Anamorphic/Letterbox) Display setting on your 16:9 flat screen you set to 1:1 pixel mapping or whatever the name is on your telly. On my own Pioneer Kuro LX5090H 16:9 flat tv it's called 'Dot by Dot'. If set correct then the image on your 16:9 flat screen should look something like the screen croppings on these pictures/images: http://someimage.com/Q2le You got image/screen cropping like on the pictures? Now then please search 'Anamorphic Widescreen' in Youtube for more video reference. Ok, now try doing same playback procedure with a cropped so-called "2.35:1" 1920x800 rip. 1920x800 cannot be 2.35:1 on a tv screen. It's impossible! On a correct set tv screen it get's stretched to 1.85:1, because part of the black areas are cropped of. --- If you want to watch 1.85:1 aspect ratio movies in the correct aspect ratio you then set the aspect ratio to 2.35:1, as well, and the image will have the "small" black bars. --- Aspect ratios on 16:9 flat tv (Display setting on tv set to 1:1 pixel mapping): 1.33:1 - Black bars at sides of image (4:3) - Aka 1.37:1 Academy Standard 1.78:1 - Full screen. Image fills whole of screen (16:9) - HDTV & Home Video 1.85:1 - Black bars Top & Bottom of image (Small) - Movies, HDTV & Home Video 2.35:1 - Black bars Top & Bottom of image (Big) - Aka 2.40:1 & Anamorphic Scope 3) Why don't You crop 2.35:1 Film Aspect Ratio Movies? Read Here: http://www.widescreen.org/index.shtml http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letterboxing_(filming) (-G-)
File list not available. |
"...Aka 2.40:1 & Anamorphic Scope"
Partially wrong - on dvd this would be anamorphic, but on bluray it isn't - blu ray doesn't support anamorphic at all. On dvd - 2.40:1 is letterboxed to 16:9, then encoded to whichever dvd video standard and that causes vertical stretching - anamorphic video (depending on dvd region - pal or ntsc). DVD players display the video in proper aspect ratio because of the .ifo file.
When you speak of bluray and bluray rips you shouldn't mention anamorphic at all - blu ray movies are either 16:9 full-frame or letterboxed to 16:9 during encoding (4:3* and 5:3* - black bars on the sides, other aspect ratios with black bars on top and bottom)
*5:3 aspect ratio is very rare - standard european cinema widescreen - for example - Robocop Criterion collection DVD.
4:3 movies actually don't need to be letterboxed to 16:9 because official blu ray specs support 1440:1080 resolution (4:3 fullhd).
And when you mention that tv screens remove some video on the sides and on top and bottom - it has nothing to do with resolution -it has been a charracteristic of all tv screens since mid-90s and is called overscan (removing sides of video because video recorded with old-school video-cameras is deformed/distorted on the sides). I really don't know why tv manufacturers are keeping this feature alive today, it's completely unneccesary.
Partially wrong - on dvd this would be anamorphic, but on bluray it isn't - blu ray doesn't support anamorphic at all. On dvd - 2.40:1 is letterboxed to 16:9, then encoded to whichever dvd video standard and that causes vertical stretching - anamorphic video (depending on dvd region - pal or ntsc). DVD players display the video in proper aspect ratio because of the .ifo file.
When you speak of bluray and bluray rips you shouldn't mention anamorphic at all - blu ray movies are either 16:9 full-frame or letterboxed to 16:9 during encoding (4:3* and 5:3* - black bars on the sides, other aspect ratios with black bars on top and bottom)
*5:3 aspect ratio is very rare - standard european cinema widescreen - for example - Robocop Criterion collection DVD.
4:3 movies actually don't need to be letterboxed to 16:9 because official blu ray specs support 1440:1080 resolution (4:3 fullhd).
And when you mention that tv screens remove some video on the sides and on top and bottom - it has nothing to do with resolution -it has been a charracteristic of all tv screens since mid-90s and is called overscan (removing sides of video because video recorded with old-school video-cameras is deformed/distorted on the sides). I really don't know why tv manufacturers are keeping this feature alive today, it's completely unneccesary.
panavision is actually 2.1:1, not 2.35:1. Cinemascope is 2.35-2.40:1.
@FlankerB1:
Say what?
Did you even read my nfo it's all explained in there - your obviously didn't read my nfo and you obviously doesn't have a clue about what your'e talking about. Sorry.
Say what?
Did you even read my nfo it's all explained in there - your obviously didn't read my nfo and you obviously doesn't have a clue about what your'e talking about. Sorry.
We all know who's the idiot here, except you, mate.
Go troll somewhere else, Ignorant Clown!
Go troll somewhere else, Ignorant Clown!
Well whaddya know -- qusawa finally got his pink skull taken away. Noobass.
@RedOill:
He'll probably be back. He's too stupid not to!
Did Nexus.69 get banned at the same time qusaw3eea got his skull pulled?
What did Nexus.69 do to get banned?
He'll probably be back. He's too stupid not to!
Did Nexus.69 get banned at the same time qusaw3eea got his skull pulled?
What did Nexus.69 do to get banned?
Ok, mate. I just wondered, because your links at qusawas page disappeared suddenly, and of what I've read of your writing you didn't deserve a banning.
Anyway, cool you're cool about the banning. :)
Anyway, cool you're cool about the banning. :)
Thanks for your effort, I appreciate it. Will seed as long as I can.
Comments