Midnight Run 1988 HD-DVD Rip 1080p x264 eac3 5.1-HighCode
- Type:
- Video > HD - Movies
- Files:
- 2
- Size:
- 14.63 GiB (15711282676 Bytes)
- Info:
- IMDB
- Tag(s):
- Action Comedy Crime Robert De Niro
- Uploaded:
- 2014-08-08 07:30:35 GMT
- By:
-
HighCode
- Seeders:
- 0
- Leechers:
- 5
- Comments
- 10
- Info Hash: 303941FA988C63116C72BBBF0B5ACBECDE16A076
(Problems with magnets links are fixed by upgrading your torrent client!)
Midnight Run 1988 HD-DVD Rip 1080p x264 eac3 5.1-HighCode (Action, Comedy, Crime, Robert De Niro) https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0095631/ An accountant is chased by bounty hunters, the FBI, and the Mafia after jumping bail. Source-------- HD-DVD / VC-1 @22MBps Released------ 2014/08/07 @HDA Format-------- Matroska/h264 File size----- 14.6GB Length-------- 2:06:15 Video Bit rate ~15MBps Resolution---- 1920/1040 Frame rate---- 23.976 fps Audio--------- eac3 (DD+) 5.1 @1.5MBps Subtitles----- Eng, Dan, Fre, Ger, Rus, Spa Encoder------- HighCode
| File list not available. |
Thank you!
I sure hope that it is L4.1 : )
Cheers!
I sure hope that it is L4.1 : )
Cheers!
PHUK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It's L4.2... Geez dude. Why do you frigg'n INSIST on using this offbeat, loser format. I can't even re-encode it like I could your previous L5.1 at least. None of the GUIs will accept it.
WHY do insist on using this format when phuk'n NOBODY else does?!! It's like 60 fps and other stupid, absolutely useless stuff.
Sorry to bitch mate, but just use the phuk'n endoder that EVERYONE here does. What makes YOU right and everyone else wrong, huh...?
It's really a shame too, because you DO indeed choose really interesting and unusual films to post. AND, other than the [email protected] level, you use nice high specs with everything else.
Just TOO damn clever for everyones else I guess...
Oh well, so much for your posts. I've gone through this quite enough...
It's L4.2... Geez dude. Why do you frigg'n INSIST on using this offbeat, loser format. I can't even re-encode it like I could your previous L5.1 at least. None of the GUIs will accept it.
WHY do insist on using this format when phuk'n NOBODY else does?!! It's like 60 fps and other stupid, absolutely useless stuff.
Sorry to bitch mate, but just use the phuk'n endoder that EVERYONE here does. What makes YOU right and everyone else wrong, huh...?
It's really a shame too, because you DO indeed choose really interesting and unusual films to post. AND, other than the [email protected] level, you use nice high specs with everything else.
Just TOO damn clever for everyones else I guess...
Oh well, so much for your posts. I've gone through this quite enough...
HighCode at 2014-08-08 11:22 CET:
If you can't appreciate these files you obviously don't have a big calibrated screen and you can't see any quality difference between my files and small 720p-s, well then look elsewhere and stop moaning. I got the message, these are not good for you then for God's sake stop visiting my torrents, simple as that. Farewell and good luck. You can't re-encode them because you're too thick and who the "PHUK" cares about your issues, my files are made to be viewed, not re-encoded. pathetic troll
@thelathe
do you have any idea how much time and effort an uploader puts to encode and upload movies like this ?
instead of appreciating their effort you are moaning and bitching about your phuk'n reason for not being able to re-encode it
if you do some google search before moaning you will find that 4.2 is better than 4.1 and has advantages over 4.1
you better download other files for re-encoding or whatever you want to do
these files are for viewing purpose and for those who want's to store BD's or HD-DVD's in smaller size with out losing quality
do you have any idea how much time and effort an uploader puts to encode and upload movies like this ?
instead of appreciating their effort you are moaning and bitching about your phuk'n reason for not being able to re-encode it
if you do some google search before moaning you will find that 4.2 is better than 4.1 and has advantages over 4.1
you better download other files for re-encoding or whatever you want to do
these files are for viewing purpose and for those who want's to store BD's or HD-DVD's in smaller size with out losing quality
Finally, a great BIG HD file for this deserving movie!
Thanks so much for all your hard work!
Thanks so much for all your hard work!
Thanks so much! Great Movie. Another appreciated up
All right, all right...
I truly do NOT mean just to be a troll : )
And yeah, I'll just choose other files that I CAN play, okay... But, I was just SO frustrated, because I really would love to have a nice full HD print of this film (and many others that you do indeed take the time and work to do) I guess I will just have be a bit (LOT) more gracious here and not take it out on you.
Just a last humble thought please, so that you can at least maybe understand where I'm coming from, okay? In other words, people here almost to the person (for larger, high quality, nice files like yours) use the same level. And at least as far as I can tell with my moderately nice OPPO player and 50" Plasma screen (which I have indeed calibrated normally) These encodes that say Grym for example or even BOZX (used to be) their 1080, DTS encodes assuming that the source is decent are so good that quite honestly, they are really intistingushible from the originals.
So, ALL I am saying is that if you can get such high, sharp, great quality from a codec/level that 99% of everyone uses, then I truly wonder WHY is it necessary to use these more exotic levels, which utilize unrealistic specs (like 60 fps, which no normal movie is rendered at anyway) where I would GUESS that only a small percentage of people here can really benefit from? That's all...
Now, I will apologize for taking it out on you; because I KNOW you do a lot of good work here, and you DO really choose great films, which is probably why I get so pissed off : )
Anyway, best wishes m8. Sorry about that...
I truly do NOT mean just to be a troll : )
And yeah, I'll just choose other files that I CAN play, okay... But, I was just SO frustrated, because I really would love to have a nice full HD print of this film (and many others that you do indeed take the time and work to do) I guess I will just have be a bit (LOT) more gracious here and not take it out on you.
Just a last humble thought please, so that you can at least maybe understand where I'm coming from, okay? In other words, people here almost to the person (for larger, high quality, nice files like yours) use the same level. And at least as far as I can tell with my moderately nice OPPO player and 50" Plasma screen (which I have indeed calibrated normally) These encodes that say Grym for example or even BOZX (used to be) their 1080, DTS encodes assuming that the source is decent are so good that quite honestly, they are really intistingushible from the originals.
So, ALL I am saying is that if you can get such high, sharp, great quality from a codec/level that 99% of everyone uses, then I truly wonder WHY is it necessary to use these more exotic levels, which utilize unrealistic specs (like 60 fps, which no normal movie is rendered at anyway) where I would GUESS that only a small percentage of people here can really benefit from? That's all...
Now, I will apologize for taking it out on you; because I KNOW you do a lot of good work here, and you DO really choose great films, which is probably why I get so pissed off : )
Anyway, best wishes m8. Sorry about that...
Oh, just ONE more thing, if I may please...
The encode level is NOT shown in your specs; so, I guess that now that I KNOW that you always use L4.2, then I will be aware of that. But... I suppose what was so annoying (to me) was that there was no way to tell BEFORE at least downloading some of the file, what level was used. So, I'd keep finding out AFTER the fact, and I guess that's why I got so mad, sorry : )
Cheers!
The encode level is NOT shown in your specs; so, I guess that now that I KNOW that you always use L4.2, then I will be aware of that. But... I suppose what was so annoying (to me) was that there was no way to tell BEFORE at least downloading some of the file, what level was used. So, I'd keep finding out AFTER the fact, and I guess that's why I got so mad, sorry : )
Cheers!
Wait! One last, LAST thought... (I promise!)
Try to think of this fairly and objectively too, if you would please. To me, and I've teased you about this numerous times before (I won't anymore) is that YOU casually cut the audio bitrate in half, from full DTS @1500 to 768 or whatever, and you just say, 'Oh it doesn't matter, I don't hear the difference.'
Well, to me, I have a decent surround sound system and I consider myself an Audiophile (for over 30 years now) and to me, THAT is horrible and total sacrilege, but to YOU it means nothing. So, you can see how I would get really worked up about your using the higher encode level that I can't play and then just (what I would consider) pissing away half of the audio fidelity.
So, do you see how that would make me feel?
The full quality of the sound is just as vital to me as what you feel the added benefit to the picture is to you in using your higher 'level' encode.
Again, it's just preference, and we just seem to be coming at the A/V thing from different directions, that's all. Anyway, I promise not to bother you any more and I apologize again for getting so dang batshit frustrated.
Cheers!
Try to think of this fairly and objectively too, if you would please. To me, and I've teased you about this numerous times before (I won't anymore) is that YOU casually cut the audio bitrate in half, from full DTS @1500 to 768 or whatever, and you just say, 'Oh it doesn't matter, I don't hear the difference.'
Well, to me, I have a decent surround sound system and I consider myself an Audiophile (for over 30 years now) and to me, THAT is horrible and total sacrilege, but to YOU it means nothing. So, you can see how I would get really worked up about your using the higher encode level that I can't play and then just (what I would consider) pissing away half of the audio fidelity.
So, do you see how that would make me feel?
The full quality of the sound is just as vital to me as what you feel the added benefit to the picture is to you in using your higher 'level' encode.
Again, it's just preference, and we just seem to be coming at the A/V thing from different directions, that's all. Anyway, I promise not to bother you any more and I apologize again for getting so dang batshit frustrated.
Cheers!
Well, I don't give a (let it be) 'phuk" about TheLathe's problems with encoding but I have to agree with him about audio bitrate. I have an audio system which can be called 'high end" and given a choice between two similiar encodes I will always choose the one with higher audio quality. HighCode - don't treat it as exerting pressure on you, it's just a statement of my preferences :)
Comments