The Teaching of Jesus About the Future - Henry Burton Sharman
- Type:
- Other > E-books
- Files:
- 1
- Size:
- 8.78 MiB (9206964 Bytes)
- Texted language(s):
- English
- Tag(s):
- Post Millenialism Historical Historicism Eschatology Futurism Preterism Premillenialism prophecy Daniel Revelation Zionism Past fulfillment Jesus Christ God Christianity Judaism Talmud Scofield Heresy
- Uploaded:
- 2008-10-08 07:24:18 GMT
- By:
-
CuriousGeorge
- Seeders:
- 0
- Leechers:
- 1
- Comments
- 11
- Info Hash: 55C50A5DC580844ABA13AEAB3D19CF46F45F7B24
(Problems with magnets links are fixed by upgrading your torrent client!)
From 1909 (while the Church was being infiltrated by Masons, Jesuits, and other Illuminist agents of the International Jewish Kahal) 394 pages Despite what the Scofieldized Churches of North America have taught, almost all of Jesus words about the future have come to pass. While the Zionized Church waits for a pre-tribulation rapture and an Antichrist who makes a 7-year peace treaty with Israel, the true Church knows that this is a twisting of events that already took place during the 70th Week of Daniel during the crucifiction of Christ our Lord and the ensuing destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD.
| File list not available. |
What can you expect from the ignorant Timmy but further worthless stuff?
"Do you practice being an arrogant prick or were you born that way?"
Oh Commenter, Commenter, Commenter. What was it you said recently about pot and kettle?
Oh Commenter, Commenter, Commenter. What was it you said recently about pot and kettle?
Are you talking to me, fascist?
Calling someone "pedo boy" isn't engaging in debate. Try again with perhaps a touch more courtesy, and I'm more than happy to oblige.
Oh, and in case you missed it...
http://piratebayproxy.live/torrent/4431778/TalmudTimmy_Book_Pack_06-10-08
Because I'm clearly *terrified* of being engaged in real debate.
http://piratebayproxy.live/torrent/4431778/TalmudTimmy_Book_Pack_06-10-08
Because I'm clearly *terrified* of being engaged in real debate.
"lodger111 must be a jew, all he does is try and throw my own quotes back at me."
Think of it as shining a light on your own rather nasty brand of hypocrisy. You're happy to accuse people of all kinds of odious behaviour you go in for, but are clearly less happy when you're shown doing exactly the same. But if me showing you doing that makes me "a jew", and I assume you mean it as an insult, then you go right ahead and build that straw man tall and high for all to see. And if you don't know what a straw man is, Commenter, feel free to go and look it up. You'll find information like that in things we call "books".
Oh, and it's spelled "fascist", by the way. There are these things called "dictionaries" you might want to try some time as well. Or are they part of a Zionist conspiracy too?
"Do those concepts exist in your world of lechery?"
And once again with the irrelevancies, Timmy. This isn't actually about me. But I am glad you've worked your way from "paedo" through "teen pic collecter" to "lecher". It is nice to know that messages do reach your brain eventually, thick-skulled though you evidently are.
Since you're so insistent, an anti-semite is a person who is hostile to or prejudiced against semites, in particular Jews, as I'm sure you know. I'm sure not even you would have the balls to deny that you are anti-semitic.
But hey, thanks guys. Nice to know, and have demonstrated, that neither of you two are prepared to actually debate issues. I'll leave you to your cozy little world of mud-slinging, hypocrisy and bullshit. Have fun.
Think of it as shining a light on your own rather nasty brand of hypocrisy. You're happy to accuse people of all kinds of odious behaviour you go in for, but are clearly less happy when you're shown doing exactly the same. But if me showing you doing that makes me "a jew", and I assume you mean it as an insult, then you go right ahead and build that straw man tall and high for all to see. And if you don't know what a straw man is, Commenter, feel free to go and look it up. You'll find information like that in things we call "books".
Oh, and it's spelled "fascist", by the way. There are these things called "dictionaries" you might want to try some time as well. Or are they part of a Zionist conspiracy too?
"Do those concepts exist in your world of lechery?"
And once again with the irrelevancies, Timmy. This isn't actually about me. But I am glad you've worked your way from "paedo" through "teen pic collecter" to "lecher". It is nice to know that messages do reach your brain eventually, thick-skulled though you evidently are.
Since you're so insistent, an anti-semite is a person who is hostile to or prejudiced against semites, in particular Jews, as I'm sure you know. I'm sure not even you would have the balls to deny that you are anti-semitic.
But hey, thanks guys. Nice to know, and have demonstrated, that neither of you two are prepared to actually debate issues. I'll leave you to your cozy little world of mud-slinging, hypocrisy and bullshit. Have fun.
Don't be obtuse, Timmy. Did you not actually notice I said "prejudiced against Semites" and not "prejudiced against Jews"? The term is commonly used to refer to those with a hatred for Jews, even though not all Semites are Jews. You're splitting hairs and you know it.
But let's not argue over semantics. The Jews are a useful scapegoat and always have been. It worked a treat for the Third Reich - the German people in the 30s swallowed Hitler's bullshit, because their economy was in the toilet and they needed an easy target to blame for it.
I have no idea what inadequacy in your psyche leads you to hate the Jews the way you do. At a guess I'd say you just recite the same anti-Jew mantras your daddy did, and his daddy before him, without having any idea why you do it. It's a shame you weren't man enough to break that cycle of hatred. I imagine that's the case for most of your Jew-hating buddies - it's a hobby for you, like stamp-collecting or model aircraft. I rather pity you.
But let's not argue over semantics. The Jews are a useful scapegoat and always have been. It worked a treat for the Third Reich - the German people in the 30s swallowed Hitler's bullshit, because their economy was in the toilet and they needed an easy target to blame for it.
I have no idea what inadequacy in your psyche leads you to hate the Jews the way you do. At a guess I'd say you just recite the same anti-Jew mantras your daddy did, and his daddy before him, without having any idea why you do it. It's a shame you weren't man enough to break that cycle of hatred. I imagine that's the case for most of your Jew-hating buddies - it's a hobby for you, like stamp-collecting or model aircraft. I rather pity you.
I wasn't leaving it out, I was just quoting a very obvious example of scapegoating of the Jews.
Jew persecution can mostly be laid at the door of Christians, specifically Roman Catholics. The Catholic church has been anti-Jew for centuries, and with the immense power it wielded in Europe in the middle ages, it was easy to murder, expel, and otherwise persecute Jews wherever they were found. Hitler's Catholicism goes a long way towards explaining his hatred of them (along with the Catholic church's complicity in anti-Jew atrocities).
I don't have any particular axe to grind for or against the Jews. I'm not Jewish, and I personally know very few of them. There may be some truth in some of the articles you've posted; I imagine nobody knows for sure, regardless of what they may think they know. But as I've explained before, I don't like to see hatred directed at an entire race based on what some of them may or may not have done. That way lies hate crimes, genocide, ethnic cleansing. Naive I may be, but personally I'd much rather we all got along.
Jew persecution can mostly be laid at the door of Christians, specifically Roman Catholics. The Catholic church has been anti-Jew for centuries, and with the immense power it wielded in Europe in the middle ages, it was easy to murder, expel, and otherwise persecute Jews wherever they were found. Hitler's Catholicism goes a long way towards explaining his hatred of them (along with the Catholic church's complicity in anti-Jew atrocities).
I don't have any particular axe to grind for or against the Jews. I'm not Jewish, and I personally know very few of them. There may be some truth in some of the articles you've posted; I imagine nobody knows for sure, regardless of what they may think they know. But as I've explained before, I don't like to see hatred directed at an entire race based on what some of them may or may not have done. That way lies hate crimes, genocide, ethnic cleansing. Naive I may be, but personally I'd much rather we all got along.
Well, you can trace that straight back to the Christian interpretation of Jews as "Christ-killers", and the persecution that stemmed from that. Assuming you were a Christian in the middle ages, deicide would be a pretty powerful argument in favour of hating Jews. They were murdered in the Crusades, blamed (and massacred) for the Black Death, ghettoised or expelled all over Europe in the 18th and 19th centuries. All in all I think they've had a pretty raw deal at the hands of Christians and Catholic dogma.
As for Christians being persecuted by Jews, no, I don't think the blame for this can be attached to the Jews and their counterparts. Christians have been persecuted against a great deal throughout the centuries, by the Romans, by Muslims, by Hindus, by the Chinese, in revolutionary France, in republican Spain, in the Soviet Union...the list goes on. I really can't see that the Jews were responsible for all of that.
And as for so-called "persecution" of Christians by Jews in the USA now, I've covered that elsewhere, but once again I can't see how almost 80% of the population can be persecuted by some 2% or so.
As for Christians being persecuted by Jews, no, I don't think the blame for this can be attached to the Jews and their counterparts. Christians have been persecuted against a great deal throughout the centuries, by the Romans, by Muslims, by Hindus, by the Chinese, in revolutionary France, in republican Spain, in the Soviet Union...the list goes on. I really can't see that the Jews were responsible for all of that.
And as for so-called "persecution" of Christians by Jews in the USA now, I've covered that elsewhere, but once again I can't see how almost 80% of the population can be persecuted by some 2% or so.
"So Jews in the Soviet Union didnt murder over 60 milloin (mostly Christian) in the Bolshevik Revolution. WOW! So Jews have never ritualistically sacrificed Christian babies on their alters, despite the voluminous amounts of documentation to the contrary.
Jews arent behind every single anti-Christian organization (homosexual lobby. man love boy, international altheist and communist organizations et al) ???"
Heh. I forgot for a moment who I was debating with. I'd love to know where you get that figure of 60 million from, especially as the population of the Russian Empire was only about 180 million pre-revolution. If you really think that a country could put in place the mechanism to exterminate a full third of its population, and still function in any meaningful way afterwards, then you're just too bewildered for words. And I'm not even going to start on the paranoia of those other claims.
"WOW...where did you learn your "history?"
The same place almost everyone learns their history - from history books and journals. To be as kind as I can about it, your version of history seems to come from some very dubious sources.
Timmy, whenever you see anything you don't like, you're going to see phantom Jews pulling the strings. You're always going to believe the stuff you post, outlandish though it is, and I'm always going to have the same opinion of it that I do now. We might as well agree to differ, or we'll be doing this forever to no good purpose. I imagine that in the fullness of time, we'll both know who was right, won't we?
Jews arent behind every single anti-Christian organization (homosexual lobby. man love boy, international altheist and communist organizations et al) ???"
Heh. I forgot for a moment who I was debating with. I'd love to know where you get that figure of 60 million from, especially as the population of the Russian Empire was only about 180 million pre-revolution. If you really think that a country could put in place the mechanism to exterminate a full third of its population, and still function in any meaningful way afterwards, then you're just too bewildered for words. And I'm not even going to start on the paranoia of those other claims.
"WOW...where did you learn your "history?"
The same place almost everyone learns their history - from history books and journals. To be as kind as I can about it, your version of history seems to come from some very dubious sources.
Timmy, whenever you see anything you don't like, you're going to see phantom Jews pulling the strings. You're always going to believe the stuff you post, outlandish though it is, and I'm always going to have the same opinion of it that I do now. We might as well agree to differ, or we'll be doing this forever to no good purpose. I imagine that in the fullness of time, we'll both know who was right, won't we?
Reference: KASTEIN, Josef. History and Destiny of the Jews (1933).
"During the 19th Century (as Dr. Kastein, again, records) the term "antisemitism" was born. As "persecution" could no longer be said to exist, some new word had to be found, capable of intimidating Gentiles and terrifying Jews, the second purpose being more important than the first, and "antisemitism" was invented. "Abracadabra" might have served as well, for the term "antisemitism" is patently absurd in relation to people who are demonstrably not Semites and whose Law commands the extirpation of Semites (the Arab peoples of Palestine; any expression of sympathy with the Semitic Arabs, expelled from their native land by the Zionist intruders in 1948, in time came to be attacked as "antisemitism").
Presumably the authors of this term desired to keep such words as Jew, Jewish and anti-Jewish out of the public controversy and counted on intimidating the mass-mind by the introduction of an obscurantist word. What the dominant sect meant by "antisemitism" was in fact a combination of lese majesty (offences against the dignity of the sovereign power) and heresy (opposition to the paramount religious doctrine); and by the middle of the present century the mass-mind had to a great extent submitted to this idea; that numerous breed which in earlier times would have doffed its cap at the approach of the squire's bailiff or have crossed itself when the priestly eye turned its way held its tongue and looked respectful when any Jewish affair was mentioned."
From Douglas Reed's 'The Controversy of Zion' p. 174.
"During the 19th Century (as Dr. Kastein, again, records) the term "antisemitism" was born. As "persecution" could no longer be said to exist, some new word had to be found, capable of intimidating Gentiles and terrifying Jews, the second purpose being more important than the first, and "antisemitism" was invented. "Abracadabra" might have served as well, for the term "antisemitism" is patently absurd in relation to people who are demonstrably not Semites and whose Law commands the extirpation of Semites (the Arab peoples of Palestine; any expression of sympathy with the Semitic Arabs, expelled from their native land by the Zionist intruders in 1948, in time came to be attacked as "antisemitism").
Presumably the authors of this term desired to keep such words as Jew, Jewish and anti-Jewish out of the public controversy and counted on intimidating the mass-mind by the introduction of an obscurantist word. What the dominant sect meant by "antisemitism" was in fact a combination of lese majesty (offences against the dignity of the sovereign power) and heresy (opposition to the paramount religious doctrine); and by the middle of the present century the mass-mind had to a great extent submitted to this idea; that numerous breed which in earlier times would have doffed its cap at the approach of the squire's bailiff or have crossed itself when the priestly eye turned its way held its tongue and looked respectful when any Jewish affair was mentioned."
From Douglas Reed's 'The Controversy of Zion' p. 174.
Comments