ambivilous: While I understand why some people prefer them not to be rar'd, it is possible to get a corrupt file when downloading, so on large files like this it is better to Rar.

After all redownloading a 50mb file and replacing the corrupt one is a lot better than redownloading 1.09gigs.

I've only had it happen twice, but still. I'd rather have the rars.

I dont understand the big deal either way. It takes literally a min to auto extract all 1.09 gb of the files with winrar. so why do people complain if it is rar'd?

Because of harddrive space concerns. If the torrent is just the video file, the torrent user gets the best of all worlds- The ability to keep seeding for however long he/she prefers, and the ability to watch without using more HDD space than the torrent itself, whereas rar archives essentially doubles the necessary harddrive space, which leads to shorter seed times as people generally don't want to keep the rar's around once they got the file extracted.