Avatar TS XVID - Better in 3D(No Rars)
- Type:
- Video > Movies
- Files:
- 3
- Size:
- 1.4 GiB (1498553479 Bytes)
- Info:
- IMDB
- Spoken language(s):
- English
- Tag(s):
- Action Adventure Sci-Fi Thriller
- Uploaded:
- 2009-12-20 18:43:31 GMT
- By:
- cgaurav007
- Seeders:
- 0
- Leechers:
- 1
- Comments
- 32
- Info Hash: C42D05BE0B94DA9AE60D7D036EA989AC6CC77AA0
(Problems with magnets links are fixed by upgrading your torrent client!)
Avatar 2009 Release Group: Better in 3D Release Name: Avatar TS XVID - Better in 3D Release Date: December 19, 2009 Filename: Avatar.avi Source: TS Size: 1.40 GB Genre: Action | Adventure | Sci-Fi | Thriller Video: XviD | 704*288 | 1146 Kbps Audio: English | 128kbps | MP3 Subtitles: None Runtime: 2hrs 33min IMDB Rating: 8.9/10 (12,466 votes) Top 250: #51 RT Critics: 7.4/10 (195 reviews) Directed By: James Cameron Starring: Sam Worthington, Zoe Saldana, Stephen Lang, Sigourney Weaver A paraplegic marine dispatched to the planet Pandora on a unique mission becomes torn between following his orders and protecting the world he feels is his home NOTES:- Same as others but video and audio tweaked differently,oh and also still no subs.
| File list not available. |
guys is this reall a 3D ??!!
NO INVENTEN, SE VEN LOS CAMBIOS DE ROLLOS....
EN MI OPINION NO LO DESCARGUEN, YA QUE NO ES DE LA VERSION DIGITAL, SINO DE LA DE 35 MM
EN MI OPINION NO LO DESCARGUEN, YA QUE NO ES DE LA VERSION DIGITAL, SINO DE LA DE 35 MM
@ isisx3
You're right, that was an extremely arrogant comment made and there ARE too many people who think the world revolves around them. However, as an American I would like to point out that not everyone here is as ignorant as that guy. There will always be self-centered people like him mouthing off, but I hope you recognize that not all Americans reflect his opinions. Just because there's one idiot here doesn't mean you should hold it against all of us.
You're right, that was an extremely arrogant comment made and there ARE too many people who think the world revolves around them. However, as an American I would like to point out that not everyone here is as ignorant as that guy. There will always be self-centered people like him mouthing off, but I hope you recognize that not all Americans reflect his opinions. Just because there's one idiot here doesn't mean you should hold it against all of us.
1) This movie is only worth seeing in 3D. The story is basically Fern Gully in space. I mean every five minutes you are going "Oh, they ripped this off from such-and-such." But the 3D effect is truly captivating. There are a few eye-straining short-focus scenes, but it's by far the best 3D effects I've ever seen.
2) When it releases on DVD/BluRay there should be an anaglyph (red/blue lens) version available. You can watch that at home with no special equipment but the cardboard glasses.
3) In the theatre they use polarized light filters, one direction over each eye, and two projectors. You can spend $7000 buying a 52 inch LCD with polarized 3D built in, or do what I did and use two projectors converged (matching images), and put a $45 filter on each lens. It works, but so far I have ONE film in that format: UP.
:P If anyone can produce an anaglyph OR polarized release, I'd greatly appreciate it. For my setup, I require seperate Left and Right video tracks for polarized playback. It's a pain... Mostly I use it for CAD modeling.
2) When it releases on DVD/BluRay there should be an anaglyph (red/blue lens) version available. You can watch that at home with no special equipment but the cardboard glasses.
3) In the theatre they use polarized light filters, one direction over each eye, and two projectors. You can spend $7000 buying a 52 inch LCD with polarized 3D built in, or do what I did and use two projectors converged (matching images), and put a $45 filter on each lens. It works, but so far I have ONE film in that format: UP.
:P If anyone can produce an anaglyph OR polarized release, I'd greatly appreciate it. For my setup, I require seperate Left and Right video tracks for polarized playback. It's a pain... Mostly I use it for CAD modeling.
P.S.: 3) LOW quality video (and not in 3D of any type). No mistaking a theatre screener here. I'd say V:3 (expected for most screeners) A:6 (better than most), but basically only download this movie at all if you can't afford the theatre tickets, and you don't want to wait for a DVD rip.
Xris22, I thought a polarized copy would play fine as well, but a friend told me it wouldn't, so I got doing some research. Normal LCD's very functionality is provided by linear polarization. I could waste a couple of paragraphs going over the technical details, but, basically, all light coming from conventional LCD is polarized in some linear direction (usually horizontally or vertically). The effect would be destroyed before it even had a chance. Needless to say, an LCD projector would do the same. A DLP projector and a silver screen is most likely the only way you could play a TS of the polarized film and have it look right (and it's still a long shot).
ProhetZarquon, thanks for saving me the trouble of grabbing this by telling me it's not polarized. Clearly, this isn't the waste of time that I'm looking for. Minor correction to point 3, RealD actually uses an alternating frames method via a single projector and a liquid crystal filter that reverses it's polarity every frame. Sadly, instead of copying RealD's method, the $7000 TV uses interlacing, which cuts the vertical resolution in half. Which makes the method you're using the best that is currently available (but it's hard to find movies in that format, as you've observed). However, regarding point 2, the only 3D release they're planning is a 3D Blu-Ray for 3D TVs (the thought of anaglyphing this movie probably makes Cameron sick to his stomach, and rightfully so, it would be pure butchery). Hopefully the glasses-free 3D TVs won't cost too much when they come out. I'd rather buy an HMD than get one of those active glasses setups (I'd be watching it alone either way, those glasses cost too much, but the HMD is flicker free and you can add a head tracker to it for full VR at least).
ProhetZarquon, thanks for saving me the trouble of grabbing this by telling me it's not polarized. Clearly, this isn't the waste of time that I'm looking for. Minor correction to point 3, RealD actually uses an alternating frames method via a single projector and a liquid crystal filter that reverses it's polarity every frame. Sadly, instead of copying RealD's method, the $7000 TV uses interlacing, which cuts the vertical resolution in half. Which makes the method you're using the best that is currently available (but it's hard to find movies in that format, as you've observed). However, regarding point 2, the only 3D release they're planning is a 3D Blu-Ray for 3D TVs (the thought of anaglyphing this movie probably makes Cameron sick to his stomach, and rightfully so, it would be pure butchery). Hopefully the glasses-free 3D TVs won't cost too much when they come out. I'd rather buy an HMD than get one of those active glasses setups (I'd be watching it alone either way, those glasses cost too much, but the HMD is flicker free and you can add a head tracker to it for full VR at least).
Comments