Returner 2002 720p BluRay x264-LCHD
- Type:
- Video > HD - Movies
- Files:
- 1
- Size:
- 4.37 GiB (4693095298 Bytes)
- Info:
- IMDB
- Uploaded:
- 2010-05-14 10:02:10 GMT
- By:
-
aoloffline
- Seeders:
- 0
- Leechers:
- 7
- Comments
- 6
- Info Hash: 325FE26C4280AD50F350BB3A0DF4DD3557BE6C8A
(Problems with magnets links are fixed by upgrading your torrent client!)
Returner.2002.720p.BluRay.x264-LCHD Release Date : 2010/05/13 Video Bitrate............. : [email protected] 4924K Audio Bitrate ........... : AC3 640K Frame Rate : 23.976 Fps Resolution : 1280x552 Running Time :112Mins FiLe Rars ...... 94x50MB Language......... Japanese Substitle.........English http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0339579/ greeting:CiNEFiLE,SiNNERS http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/1816/bscap0001au.jpg http://img31.imageshack.us/img31/1959/bscap0000jg.jpg
| File list not available. |
A/R is wrong, lots of combing in some scenes, start is chopped. Poor quality rip. but it is the only hires version currently available...
@boss5705
"...A/R is wrong, lots of combing in some scenes, start is chopped. Poor quality rip. but it is the only hires version currently available... "
A/R isn't wrong, just ( at least in MPC HC ) go to:
RMB > Pan&Scan > Scale to 16/9 TV, after that everything is fine & A/R is correct. About quality - it's not true also that rip is bad. Quality is just fine, original BluRay had such quality so there's nothing ripper could do with it. Do not hesitate to down as it's simply the best copy floating around the web. Movie is fine also ;).
Cheers
"...A/R is wrong, lots of combing in some scenes, start is chopped. Poor quality rip. but it is the only hires version currently available... "
A/R isn't wrong, just ( at least in MPC HC ) go to:
RMB > Pan&Scan > Scale to 16/9 TV, after that everything is fine & A/R is correct. About quality - it's not true also that rip is bad. Quality is just fine, original BluRay had such quality so there's nothing ripper could do with it. Do not hesitate to down as it's simply the best copy floating around the web. Movie is fine also ;).
Cheers
The video is too mushy to be from BluRay, looks like its just an upscale from the DVD version.
And now I know its from a DVD, since the video has some interlacing that was missed during the conversion, at 35 seconds into the movie.
Why do people make fake HD versions? I also found a 1080p version of this same release, from the same crappy low-rez source. What's the point?
Why do people make fake HD versions? I also found a 1080p version of this same release, from the same crappy low-rez source. What's the point?
Comments