The Dark Crystal (1982).720P.BRRip.H264.ResourceRG by Dusty
- Type:
- Video > HD - Movies
- Files:
- 11
- Size:
- 2.04 GiB (2189867221 Bytes)
- Info:
- IMDB
- Spoken language(s):
- English
- Tag(s):
- fantasy 80s
- Uploaded:
- 2010-08-04 10:24:26 GMT
- By:
- neon
- Seeders:
- 0
- Leechers:
- 1
- Comments
- 6
- Info Hash: 3C6D15A6D8BFDC262D0C0B597F992FC5D82125BF
(Problems with magnets links are fixed by upgrading your torrent client!)
Storyline: On another planet in the distant past, a Gelfling embarks on a quest to find the missing shard of a magical crystal, and so restore order to his world. Cast: Jim Henson ... Jen / High Priest (Ritual Master) / Podling / Additional Characters Kathryn Mullen ... Kira, A Gelfling (performer) / Jen, A Gelfling (assistant) / Additional Characters (uncredited) Frank Oz ... Aughra - A Keeper Of Secrets / Chamberlain / Podling / Additional Characters Dave Goelz ... Fizzgig, A Friendly Monster (performer) / General (Garthin Master) (performer) / Dying Emperor (performer) / Podling (performer) Steve Whitmire ... Scientist (performer and voice) / Kira, A Gelfling (assistant) (voice) Louise Gold ... Gourmand (performer) Brian Muehl ... Ornamentalist (performer and voice) / Urzah (performer) / Dying Master (performer and voice) (voice) Bob Payne ... Historian (Scrollkeeper) (performer) Mike Quinn ... Slave Master (performer) Tim Rose ... Treasurer (performer) Jean-Pierre Amiel ... Weaver (performer) (as Jean Pierre Amiel) Hugh Spight ... Cook / Landstrider (performer) Robbie Barnett ... Numerologist (performer) / Landstrider (performer) Swee Lim ... Hunter / Landstrider - Performer Simon Williamson ... Ursol, The Chanter (performer) Genre: Animation | Adventure | Family | Fantasy Rating: 7.0/10 IMDB: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083791/ Basic Information: Encoded By: Dusty Bottums Film Length: 1h 33mn Size of MP4 file: 2.00 GiB Language: English Original Source: The.Dark.Crystal.1080p.BluRay.WMV-HD.BD9-KOADIC Video Information: Format: H.264/MPEG-4 AVC Video Bitrate: 2559 Kbps Framerate: 23.976fps Encoder: x264 Display aspect ratio: 16:9 Resolution: 1280X544 Audio Information: Format: mp4a: MPEG-4 AAC LC Audio #1: 384kb/s 48000 Hz 6-channel Audio #2: 128kb/s 48000 Hz 2-channel Audio Language: English Subs: None
File list not available. |
no offense to this upload but whats up with everyone claiming 720p when the height of the video is only 544 which unfortunately is NOT 720p.
Bugnuts: I agree that 544 isn't 720, but then again, as *I* understand the definition, it's not solely the height that makes HD, but also the width, which is 1280. Which means it's HD-Cinema format, 2.21:1/2.35:1 (mostly), instead of HD-TV/-Movie format which is 16:9. Yeah, go figure...
For a TRUE description, uploaders SHOULD say it's 544p, but that would just confuse people uneducated in the mediaformats even more.
It seems MOST people know the difference between 480p (iPod-format), 720p (HD-TV) and 1080p (BluRay-format), but not that cinematic formats differ from these. So when uploaders claim 720p I believe it's to avoid confusion, nothing more sinister than that.
PS: I don't think HD-Cinema is a proper name, just a more honest definition I made up right now...
For a TRUE description, uploaders SHOULD say it's 544p, but that would just confuse people uneducated in the mediaformats even more.
It seems MOST people know the difference between 480p (iPod-format), 720p (HD-TV) and 1080p (BluRay-format), but not that cinematic formats differ from these. So when uploaders claim 720p I believe it's to avoid confusion, nothing more sinister than that.
PS: I don't think HD-Cinema is a proper name, just a more honest definition I made up right now...
all films have less height than normal, it's to give it cinema/widescreen feel. it's the width that makes it HD in most cases - standard practice
well if the ripper did not crop out the black letterbox, it's 720p..
as long as the "720p" tells us that its in HD (as long as the width of the video is 1280 px), why bother oveer such small stuffs?
*shrugs*
as long as the "720p" tells us that its in HD (as long as the width of the video is 1280 px), why bother oveer such small stuffs?
*shrugs*
Comments