Details for this torrent 

The.Daily.Show.2012.12.11.Laura.Linney.PROPER.XVID-AVIGUY.avi
Type:
Video > TV shows
Files:
1
Size:
143.11 MiB (150058534 Bytes)
Info:
IMDB
Spoken language(s):
English
Uploaded:
2012-12-12 09:47:03 GMT
By:
MP4SUX VIP
Seeders:
1
Leechers:
0
Comments
3  

Info Hash:
26596E2BC80DB57FB30C1E0755E5BF10AEFE537C




(Problems with magnets links are fixed by upgrading your torrent client!)
Yes, two choices tonight (try the MINI)
.
========= IMDB.com/title/tt0115147/
KAgmLAaei
Release Name: The.Daily.Show.2012.12.11.Laura.Linney.PROPER.XVID-AVIGUY.avi
s17e196
From AVIGUY:
Release Date.: 2012-12.11
Release Size: 143 Mb
Run Time.......: 21:25
Resolution.....: 624x352
Video Codec...: XVID AVI
Video Bitrate..: 768 Kbps
Audio: MP3 160 Kbps 48KHz CBR

File list not available.

Comments

Supermod soda:

Don't know if you listen back in, but message received. I only wanted to alert people when damaged goods were being presented as "Quality Merchandise", that my efforts are so numerous as to border on spam, well maybe you did me a favor by warning me off my "lost cause".

Well, that quashes my "raison d'ĂȘtre", my "mission from god".

Local supermind overrules the god in my head. It happens.

Bummer.

Well, it's not like LOL / DIMENSION were going to stop their evil pixelating ways, right?

So, from now on I'm a convert, this'll be my last mention of LOL / DIM - doesn't the Emperor's new clothes look just stunning?

Gonna re-think, gonna slow down, gonna finish XIII: the series season 2.

May be time for a break (the hours are great, the wages non).

AVI XVID is still needed, so how about some kind soul(s) start stepping up?

UseNet's somewhat shot for sourcefiles. Maybe waiting to see how that shakes out is part of what's becoming a clearer "message from the universe".

Like Ali Baba once said - "There's always tomorrow".

MP4SUX
I noticed and it took me a couple hours to think to look here - thank you very much.

It's a shame to give up what started me on all this in the first place,
But I suppose my point's been made (overboard, obviously).

I just think somewhere would be some sense of quality control.
I guess my statements will be best made by setting a good example.

I hope mentioning WHY I've waited for a "WEB-DL" in my own description is permitted?
If not, please let me know.

For the record, I'm having the time of my life here (and there and UseNet too!).

Thanx for such a rich and diverse corner of cyberspace for me to play.

AVIGUY
For the record - on the rare occasion that one of my files is defective
I want anybody and everybody to tell me as soon as possible.
I then make great efforts to solve or rectify the problem.
It truly bothers me when I put out damaged goods - no matter the excuse.

I just think it's a shame that others don't share this view.
They used to. They used to rush right out with a repack, proper or whatever.
Now they pretend that big black blotches are no big deal.
Just read in an EZTV forum how people with streaming devices have
their video aborted by these pixelation errors every time.
These errors are caused by the more CPU intensive x264 encoding on-the-fly
A rational person would just save the recording and encode it properly after.
It would waste a whole half or full hour. But speed now trumps quality.

Jes' sayin'

AVIGUY