Details for this torrent 

Godzilla.1998.Mastered.In.4k.1080p.BluRay.DTS.x264-PublicHD
Type:
Video > HD - Movies
Files:
2
Size:
12.34 GiB (13253215865 Bytes)
Info:
IMDB
Spoken language(s):
English
Texted language(s):
English, French, Spanish, Chinese, Korean
Uploaded:
2013-07-30 10:34:08 GMT
By:
TPBAgri Trusted
Seeders:
0
Leechers:
1
Comments
1  

Info Hash:
886BCB9329DAA902831FACA3BF0A46DA4B82B2F5




(Problems with magnets links are fixed by upgrading your torrent client!)
                PublicHD - High-Definition Bittorrent Community
      
                           
    
              ----------------------------------------------------

Godzilla.1998.Mastered.In.4k.1080p.BluRay.DTS.x264-PublicHD
 
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120685/

Date ...............: July 30 2013
Runtime ............: 2:18:43
Size ...............: 12.3 GB
Video ..............: 1920x804
Bitrate ............: 11200 kbps (x264 [email protected] 2 Pass)
Audio 1.............: English DTS 5.1 Ch 1510 kbps
Chapters............: Yes
Source .............: 1080p Blu-ray AVC DTS-HD MA 5.1-Shadowman
Subs ...............: English Chinese French Korean Spanish Thai

Screens.............: $55,726,951 (USA) (25 May 1998) (3,310 Screens)
Genre ..............: Action | Sci-Fi | Thriller


SCREENS
 
http://someimage.com/ZtMSlsh
 
http://someimage.com/AQtP7tm
 
http://someimage.com/1gzddF6
 
http://someimage.com/gzwmtkb
 
http://someimage.com/NXTYf1X
 
http://someimage.com/5thwaBc
 
http://someimage.com/7VoZ1O2
 
http://someimage.com/5kZcJmo
 
http://someimage.com/3xqGkav
 
http://someimage.com/q1imlqI
 
http://someimage.com/mSLkEZ9
 
http://someimage.com/vE2rOSt

File list not available.

Comments

Not sure why you put "Mastered in 4k" in the title. Your source is a 1080p physical disk, so anything further up the chain than that is largely irrelevant. Also, bit rates are waaaaay too high. You don't even need that much for 60" screens. Audio is too big as well. 960kbps is plenty for 5.1 audio (160kbps per channel = "CD-like quality audio"). I'm curious as to why you're encoding using 2-pass still. I thought I was one of the last guys to use that and even I quit that about a year ago. There's simply no advantage to 2-pass anymore, and it takes twice as long to encode. How did you even come up with your target bit rate? There is absolutely no difference in audio or video quality between CRF and 2-pass, and really without running it first using CRF, you're kinda just blindly guessing when it comes to your bit rate, are you not?