Transformers (2007) 1080p 5.1 BDRip x264 HQ - Judas
- Type:
- Video > HD - Movies
- Files:
- 4
- Size:
- 10.98 GiB (11784807169 Bytes)
- Info:
- IMDB
- Spoken language(s):
- English
- Texted language(s):
- English
- Tag(s):
- Transformers 2007 Judas mp4 x264 aac 1080p 5.1 bluray bdrip brrip
- Uploaded:
- 2013-10-11 19:34:08 GMT
- By:
-
dhjudasx
- Seeders:
- 0
- Leechers:
- 1
- Comments
- 10
- Info Hash: F3F75E83D2940B3CED29D9D564C3A4D131049FE7
(Problems with magnets links are fixed by upgrading your torrent client!)
Transformers [FORMAT]:........[ MP4 x264 VBR 10,500 kb/s ([email protected]) {CRF Placebo} [Settings]:......[ SUBME=11 (Full RD) / ME=TESA {SATD Exhaustive} [FILE SIZE]:.....[ 10.9GB [RESOLUTION]:....[ 1920x800 [FRAME RATE]:....[ 23.976 fps [AUDIO STREAM 1]:[ AAC 5.1 Surround 640 kb/s 48khz (AAC/LC) {2-Pass} [LANGUAGE]:......[ English [SUBTITLES]:.....[ English (SRT File) {Foreign Dialogue Hardcoded} [RUNTIME]:.......[ 2Hr 23Min 27Sec (143 Minutes) [SOURCE].........[ 1080p Physical Retail Blu-ray Region 1|A NOTE: PS3 Users and PC Users using HDMI should ensure their audio mode configuration in the PS3/Sound Options for the device is set to have LPCM enabled/Checked for 6/7/8 channel output (for 5.1/6.1/7.1). Otherwise PS3 or PC Users will not be able to experience Surround Sound audio as you cannot bit stream AAC 5.1/6.1/7.1 for 99% of the products capable of typically decoding DTS/DD/AC3 via bit streaming. Additionally, due to the size of these HQ encodes, you cannot put them onto a FAT32 external drive and plug into a ps3, you'll NEED to use a media server to stream to it if you want to use a ps3 to playback. If you want a copy you can play on a ps3, like all my HQ encodes, there is a link at the bottom of this description to the much smaller, significantly more compressed version (under 4gb). By the way, you may also be able to attempt to attempt the same procedure with an xbox360, however I cannot guarantee playback. PC Users with 5.1/6.1/7.1 Surround: Depending on your configuration, VLC should automatically enable 5.1/6.1/7.1 playback, but double check by selecting AUDIO ~ Audio Device ~ 5.1 (if the movie is encoded with 6.1 or 7.1, either of these 2 will be shown instead of 5.1) If 5.1/6.1/7.1 isn't selected by default, and you do have 5.1/6.1/7.1 system, ensure your windows sound configuration is setup correctly by navigating to your windows control panel ~ Sound and then selecting the primary audio device followed by clicking the CONFIGURE button below, follow the steps to ensure whichever setup you have that the mode is fully enabled and operating properly (you can run the speaker test). PC Users with 2.0/2.1 Stereo: Depending on your configuration, VLC should automatically enable 2.0 playback, but double check by selecting AUDIO ~ Audio Device ~ 2.0 If 5.1/6.1/7.1 is selected by default, and you do not have this type of system, ensure your windows sound configuration is setup correctly by navigating to your windows control panel ~ Sound and then selecting the primary audio device followed by clicking the CONFIGURE button below, follow the steps to ensure 2.0 Stereo mode is fully enabled only. Keep in mind, that you can still select in VLC while using stereo speakers the 5.1/6.1/7.1 modes to potentially experience a much better balanced sound environment at the likely cost of volume. Doing this is usually for those with powerful Stereo equipment however. In the rare case that you are already experiencing low volumes or poor sound, there is a remote possibility that selecting this mode may also BOOST your quality/volume. It is EXTREMELY difficult to predict the nature of the millions of sound configurations as well as how they will react under specific environments, not to mention the fact that millions of people may have alternative decoders, filters and various different media players that may severely impact the end results, and therefore cannot be ignored but also cannot be predicted either. Either way, the Encoded audio in this video has identical levels/volumes/balancing and channel mapping to that of the physical bluray for the best possible results for an overall excellent experience for everyone. Screenshot Previews: https://imageshack.us/a/img545/3855/cphr.png https://imageshack.us/a/img543/8145/d1ue.png https://imageshack.us/a/img405/756/uzxl.png https://imageshack.us/a/img841/9687/nhcf.png https://imageshack.us/a/img706/6844/remr.png https://imageshack.us/a/img41/2732/5nuz.png https://imageshack.us/a/img7/6599/c9jz.png https://imageshack.us/a/img33/7663/myrw.png https://imageshack.us/a/img853/1821/v6be.png https://imageshack.us/a/img826/108/0wgb.png Please, be patient with seeding... Enjoy ;) Feel free to leave a + vote and a comment, Thank You! Judas's Note: This will be the last HQ movie I upload that will contain a 640kbps AAC audio track as with further testing and audio comparisons and thorough research, I've determined the peak bitrates to use. At specific levels using the truehd/dts master source to encode from (not the cores), there is a specific point at which higher bitrate encoding of AAC from those sources seriously diminishes. Basically it's mostly "wasted" data being consumed to fill blank spaces, the fidelity, depth and such do not improve at a linear rate beyond this point. To perhaps put more simply, at about 75-85% AAC quality encoding is the peak, going above these values increases the bitrate linear still, but the quality (when thoroughly analyzed) stagnates/stops. The REALLY awesome fact that AAC allows for a floating point bit depth means that there is no need for dithering or keeping a fixed value for the bit depth allowing for pretty much IDENTICAL quality if not easily better quality than most of the constant bit depth/bit rate alternative lossy formats. AAC is smart, very smart. So to finish off, all further HQ encodes will use this peak efficient and best bang for the bit style of encoding which obviously means a few extra 100MB worth of downloading, but being able to directly compete with DTS-HD 1536kbps due to AAC's serious advantages. Not to mention DTS-HD is limited to 5.1 where as AAC's bitrate can increase retaining quality while providing 6.1 and 7.1 or higher channel counts. Judas's Note 2: For a smaller, Friendlier version of this movie in around the 2-3gb range, it is located here: https://piratebayproxy.live/torrent/7965374/Transformers_%282007%29_1080p_5.1_BrRip_x264_-_Judas
| File list not available. |
Thank You.
Hi Judas
Please Encode
Saving Private Ryan 1998 1080p
02:49:28
Please Encode
Saving Private Ryan 1998 1080p
02:49:28
Neat work mate.
How about Sucker Punch HQ?
It truly deserves a perfectly crisp print made in Judas. Please do it soon, U are the best!
How about Sucker Punch HQ?
It truly deserves a perfectly crisp print made in Judas. Please do it soon, U are the best!
dhjudasx at 2013-10-18 01:51 CET:
sucker punch does sound like a plan
Woot! Woot! So glad U said so, coz I started to desperate on this.
I couldn't find a rip that gives justice to the movie, CHD 1080p torrent is soo grainy... it's no use.
I'll be sure to check Ur new uploads daily!
I couldn't find a rip that gives justice to the movie, CHD 1080p torrent is soo grainy... it's no use.
I'll be sure to check Ur new uploads daily!
dhjudasx at 2013-10-20 04:11 CET:
sucker punch is a very very grainy movie...... so i'm not sure what you're going to expect.....
OK... it's a grainy movie then.
Never mind... I trust U will get the utmost best out of it, so I am still waiting to watch the result.
Cheers mate.
Never mind... I trust U will get the utmost best out of it, so I am still waiting to watch the result.
Cheers mate.
Namaste
wanna tell U that I am not waiting anymore.
I had put a request for Sucker Punch 1080p at LoverHD.com and one of the uploaders there did a perfect encode that really really gives justice to the graphic awesomeness in this video game type movie. Its 12.5 Gb and simply neat.
Some grainy scenes are present there but unless one is scrutinizing the screen for artifacts and pixels (in vain), those few lightly grainy passages won't even be noticed, it's just amazingly 1080p sharp kickass action flick.
So maybe there is some difference in quality at the physical BluRay level, coz U seem to have a very grainy one, while obviously the source used to rip that file I've got was having very little grain to it.
So anyway, I will try Ur own rip for comparing purpose whenever U are up for it.
Peace
wanna tell U that I am not waiting anymore.
I had put a request for Sucker Punch 1080p at LoverHD.com and one of the uploaders there did a perfect encode that really really gives justice to the graphic awesomeness in this video game type movie. Its 12.5 Gb and simply neat.
Some grainy scenes are present there but unless one is scrutinizing the screen for artifacts and pixels (in vain), those few lightly grainy passages won't even be noticed, it's just amazingly 1080p sharp kickass action flick.
So maybe there is some difference in quality at the physical BluRay level, coz U seem to have a very grainy one, while obviously the source used to rip that file I've got was having very little grain to it.
So anyway, I will try Ur own rip for comparing purpose whenever U are up for it.
Peace
dhjudasx at 2013-10-30 17 CET:
directors and producers decide on the appearance of the film, using traditional film along with post effects.
They PURPOSELY put grain on many movies you see done, sometimes heavier, because they have this artistic idea that it's "the way it's meant to appear in order to retain the film like appearance" (which to be fair is their opinion and direction, whom I to disregard their approach as an artist, but all the same, i'm really REALLY not a fan of film grain, I see no purpose and clinging onto this "old fashioned film appearance" like it's a good thing seems utterly rediculious, top it off the number of people complaining about higher frame rates "breaking the way a film was intended" is also mostly a load of bull IMO)
Now there is many ways to go about "cleaning" it up, however I've yet to see an example that does it without mudding up other things. Depending on how aggressive they go about doing it of course. They may have gone just light enough on the de-noising and grain removal to make it perceptually unnoticeable about the counter issues that are introduced while doing so.
The number one thing to go while applying filters to "remove" something also removes something else, and that one thing to go first is "details". Fine details, basically the definition. Far as I could see among the various blurays is that they are all made with the same grainy appearance. So if they did indeed remove grain, you can guarantee there was an introduction of other visual errors due to it. It's a two way street/double edged sword, doing one thing will always have a counter effect generally not wanted. Suttle or not.
My goal is to retain the original sources appearance to the best of the x264's encoders abilities. This allows anyone to apply their own post effects in real time or not. Using their media player or tvs own functions if they like too.
They PURPOSELY put grain on many movies you see done, sometimes heavier, because they have this artistic idea that it's "the way it's meant to appear in order to retain the film like appearance" (which to be fair is their opinion and direction, whom I to disregard their approach as an artist, but all the same, i'm really REALLY not a fan of film grain, I see no purpose and clinging onto this "old fashioned film appearance" like it's a good thing seems utterly rediculious, top it off the number of people complaining about higher frame rates "breaking the way a film was intended" is also mostly a load of bull IMO)
Now there is many ways to go about "cleaning" it up, however I've yet to see an example that does it without mudding up other things. Depending on how aggressive they go about doing it of course. They may have gone just light enough on the de-noising and grain removal to make it perceptually unnoticeable about the counter issues that are introduced while doing so.
The number one thing to go while applying filters to "remove" something also removes something else, and that one thing to go first is "details". Fine details, basically the definition. Far as I could see among the various blurays is that they are all made with the same grainy appearance. So if they did indeed remove grain, you can guarantee there was an introduction of other visual errors due to it. It's a two way street/double edged sword, doing one thing will always have a counter effect generally not wanted. Suttle or not.
My goal is to retain the original sources appearance to the best of the x264's encoders abilities. This allows anyone to apply their own post effects in real time or not. Using their media player or tvs own functions if they like too.
thank you!
Comments